CHAPTER FOUR:
EGO PSYCHOLOGY (Book pages 71 – 95)
CHAPTER FIVE:
STRUGGLE AGAINST THE ANCESTOR (Book pages 95 -109 )
I. Fate and
Freedom
Szondi’s family
studies have shown that the basic choices of human existence are not made by
chance but are influenced by unconscious, pre-personal forces. To understand
these forces we must uncover recurrent patterns in the trans-generational
family. Analysis discloses the family to be a stage, on which members play
roles in an epic drama. The dramatic vision of the family opens up the
perspective of destiny.
By making
destiny central Szondi enters into dialogue with classical
antiquity.
Greek has several terms for destiny. One is moira, and it
means “lot,”
“portion,” or “allotment.” In Homer’s Iliad nzoira refers
mainly to death
as an allotment of a god, impersonal force, or mythic
figure. In the
Odyssey it usually means portion in the sense of honor, conduct, or material
acquisition as allotted in a stratified society (Dietrich 1967, 212-213, 231).
Related terms are aisa, which means an “equal share” and potmos, which means
“that which befalls.”
Szondi
interprets moira as a mythic being, a goddess of destiny, who
sends both good
and bad fate, disaster and death (1963a, 17). His view
reflects the
combat setting of the Iliad, the pre-Homeric chthonic culture of the goddess,
and the modern German Schicksal, which means “that which is sent.” It also
conveys the image of destiny in Hungarian, the term for which is sors, meaning
“falling Out” or “coming out” (Kerenyi 1963, 6).
Post-Homeric
Greek literature features abstract, metaphysical concepts, such as the working
of allotment (heirnarmene), chance (tyche), and necessity (ananke). The latter
is used most frequently by Szondi, when describing metaphorically the influence
of recessive genes. Szondi correctly
Chapter Four:
Participatory Ego Psychology
72
translates
necessity in both Greek and Latin (necessarius) as constraint of the will by
outside forces and by blood relatives.
Informed by
classical learning, Szondi understands destiny as an allotment of human
existence, both as a finite life span and as a dynamic unfolding of meaningful
behavior through major existential decisions. Frequently, the decisions befall
us like shock events. For many the decisions are maladaptive, compulsive, or
destructive and, therefore, described in causal terms and represented by the
metaphor of fate. Fateful decisions are often tragic in the sense that they
lead to destruction. Although not conceptualized as a category, the motif of
tragedy is a pervasive motif in the analysis of destiny.
After his
expulsion from Hungary, Szondi
went beyond his early biological-medical approach to a
dialectical-interactional model of destiny. In a pivotal essay he explains that
destiny embraces both freedom and fate (Szondi 1954b). Compulsive choice is
expressed in the German phrase Zwangs-Schicksal and free choice in
Freiheits-Schicksal. These correspond to the English terms fate and freedom,
respectively. Destiny is a unique human capacity, because only humans can make
conscious the heritage of the ancestors and the possibilities of existence.
Destiny correlates freedom and fate, future and past, culture and nature,
consciousness and uncon sciousness. Destiny is dynamic, functional, and
dialectical. It is neither totally determined nor totally free.
There is a
common tendency, particularly among theologians, to equate destiny with death.
This point of view has been inspired by Martin Heidegger’s classic phrase
“being-toward-death.” Szondi objects to the linking of destiny with death as
too dangerous, one-sided, and an absolutization of only one part of human
existence (1963b, 117). He does not develop this insight, but he offers a clue
when classi! Heidegger’s existentialism as a sublimation of autistic schizophrenia
(1956, 364).
Szondi’s
opinion is, in my view, a political judgment. A student of German culture has
detected a profound continuity between Heidegger’s “being-toward-death” and
Nazi ideology (Pachter 1976, 52). Both Heidegger and the Nazis used military terms
to emphasize that life is a training for death. They elevated death to an
ultimate level, where destiny is fulfilled in a glorious and inevitable
catastrophe.
As Szondi
learned in the First World War, death is an abstraction. The German soldiers
who returned from the front as tragic heroes and
who comprised
the nucleus of the Nazi Party sustained the abstraction as a necrophilia. They
loved death by means of a denial Gf guilt and a projection of responsibility
for the war upon others, specifically the Jews. Szondi returned from the front
with a more realistic outlook. Working in the shadow of proto-Nazi Hungarian
Fascism, he developed the theme of destiny as a vision of human dignity and
responsibility.
LI. The
Familial Unconscious
Szondi’s
development of a new model of destiny by 1954 also represents a shift from
genetics to depth psychology in his work. The task of depth psychology is to
make the unconscious conscious, in so far as this can be done. The entire range
of unconscious content cannot be known absolutely. One of Szondi’s original
contributions to depth psychology is the concept of the familial unconscious
(Das fanziliare Unbewusste). Although this idea grew out of many years of
studying families, the 1937 paper on marriage choice may be regarded as the
primary documentary source. Szondi was the first to synthesize heredity with
personality development (Wurmser 1963, 315).
The term
familial is a translation of the German farniliare, which refers both to blood
relatives and to what is customary (Bischof 1985, 195). With the findings of
Szondi’s family research we may classify the practice of marrying gene
relatives under what is customary.
The familial
unconscious is essentially the same as the genetic load but differs from it in
two respects. First, the familial unconscious expresses content in the form of
polarity. This pattern correlates with the pairing of genes and chromosomes.
Polarity accounts for the fact that the same genetic group can produce both
normal and abnormal traits, both sickness and sublimation. Second, the familial
unconscious has a latent proportion. This accounts for genetic variability,
strengths, weakness, and distribution of traits among families.
Originally,
Szondi contended that latent recessive genes constitute the familial
unconscious. This must be revised in light of the current evaluation of
Szondi’s studies in genetics. A revised model would include not only
recessives, but also dominant, sex-linked, and the intermediate range of
threshold genes. Such a view would go beyond the classical notion of the
genetic load as a heavy burden and include the balancing
73
74
and adaptive
features of an evolving psyche. The actual working of the familial unconscious
is disclosed through genotropism.
The concept of
the familial unconscious was initially proposed in light of Freudian
psychoanalysis and Jungian archetypal psychology. As is well-known, Freud
explored the personal unconscious, which bears repressed and forgotten material
since birth. Jung discovered the collective unconscious, which contains the
hereditary archetypal forms and instinctual drives.
By combining
these three dimensions, Szondi intended to lay a foundation for the unification
of depth psychology (1956). He understood these domains functionally and
neither spatially nor topographically. They are co-active and complementary
with consciousness. The personal unconscious is manifest in symptoms, the
collective in symbols, and the familial in existential decisions.
Szondi did not
integrate these unconscious domains uncritically. He agreed with Jung that
archetypes conform to psychic reality and that they inform religion and
culture. Yet Jung failed to correlate archetypes precisely with instinctual
drives, making it difficult to diagnose psychopath ology (Szondi 1952, 25).
Similarly, Szondi believed that Freud’s theory mainly reflected the struggle
between two partners in the familial unconscious. Otherwise, Szondi conceded a
profound indebtedness to Freud, as one who changed fundamentally the vision of
human existence. After Freud, existence must be conceived developmentally, and
the life of the spirit must be understood in terms of the unconscious as well
as the ambiguity of creation and destruction (Szondi 1963b, 96).
III. Concept of
the Ego
• What makes
the unconscious conscious is the ego. The emergence of the ego signifies the
birth of the human being in relation to the animal kingdom. By means of the ego
humankind surpasses the tyranny of the instincts in the hierarchy of nature.
The ego creates uniquely human activities, such as religion, art, and culture.
The ego also makes the existential choices which project unconscious familial
content.
Szondi defines
the ego with reference to the history of religion and philosophy (1947, 130).
The original and governing source for the understanding of the ego is Hinduism,
specifically the teachings of the
75
Upanishads in
the eighth century B.C.E. Szondi quotes several passages in the Brihad-Aranyaka
Upanishad (1956, 114-115), using the translation of Paul Deussen.
One passage
portrays the ego existing alone at creation as a primal
being (1.4.1):
In the
beginning the atman alone in the form of a man was this universe. He gazed
around; he saw nothing there but himself. Thereupon he cried out at the
beginning:- “It is I.” Thence originated the name I. Therefore today, when
anyone is summoned, he answers first “It is I;” and then only he names the
other names which he bears (Deussen 1966, 265).
Szondi
translates the Sanskrit term atnzan as ego with the understanding that human
nature is identified with the divine. As the creator of the world, the ego was
named Lord (Ishvara).
The other
source from the same Upanishad identifies the ego as that which dwells in
creation and yet is distinguished from it (3.7.3.): “He who dwelling on the
earth is distinct from the earth, whom the earth knows not, which the earth is,
who rules the earth from within, he is thy soul, the inner guide, the immortal”
(Deussen 1966, 206-207). Hence, the ego is the immortal and inner guide of all
persons.
Szondi
documents the history of the concepts of the ego and concludes that the various
definitions are actually projections of the nature of life (1956, 115-129). The
projections mediate reality and the human being. The various definitions of the
ego may be classified in terms of functional dependencies, which are paired
dialectically: divine omnipotence and human powerlessness, spirit and nature,
conscious and unconscious, subject and object, femininity and masculinity, soul
and body, waking and dreaming, and immanence and transcendence. These
characteristics also express the general antitheses of life. These polarities
are embraced by the ego and, therefore, may be regarded as correlative aspects.
Since these antitheses are aspects or functional dependencies, the essence of
the ego is relational and cannot be fully located in space-time regions.
IV. Phases of
Ego Development
At birth the
ego rests in a non-differentiated oneness. With the
activation of
the contact drive, through the rhythm of seeking and finding,
76
the organism
separates from the mother and strives for an independent existence. The
separating organism is threatened, however, with loneliness, beginning
particularly in the second year of life. Thereafter, the possibility of
loneliness is always present; and it is this threat with which everyone must
contend in life.
After
separation, ego development procedes through the following stages: (1)
projection, (2) inflation, (3) introjection, and (4) negation. They are
virtually ahistorical and contain general, non-specific content. The ego phases
may appear sequentially, simultaneously, or in a variety of forms. The goal of
each is to re-establish, amid the struggle for existence, a primal wholeness.
The phases inform the physiology and pathology of the psyche, and they operate
in the three personal, collective, and familial unconscious domains. The four
ego functions with respect to the three realms of the unconscious are defined
below, using illustrations from the history of religions:
(1) Projection
is “the primal, primitive unconscious elemental striving of the ego to transfer
the power and drive of the unconscious toward being onto an object of the
external world” (Szondi 1956, 160-161). The primary function of projection is
the drive for participation. Freud originally discovered projection as the
psychic mechanism of paranoia. In a pathology like paranoia unconscious content
is transferred onto distorted or delusional objects without obtaining a real
relationship. Such a transfer without participation is called secondary
projection.
Jung discovered
a collective projection in the sense of an unconscious subject-object identity
in archaic society. Collective projection establishes transpersonal forms of
being and dissolves individual identities. Szondi would agree with Jung and
emphasize that collective projection is experienced as a mystical participation
in being. Both Jung and Szondi drew upon the work of the French scholar Lucien
Lévy-Bruhi, who established the category of mystical participation (Lévy-Bruhl
1966a). Szondi defines this as “the mysterious participation of heterogeneous
things in one another, which is realized through mystical powers, working in
them” (1956, 166).
The development
of relatedness through projection is called the law of participation. This law
is exemplified by the fact that ancient languages are synthetic; each word has
a variety of meanings. Further, concepts of chance, linear causality,
objectivity, and verification are not fundamental in
77
reality but
purely secondary. Because of the interrelatedness of all things, images are
just as real as the objects they represent.
The law of
participation also accounts for the fact that the invisible realm, which is
disclosed in dream and vision, complements the visible, sensory world. The
correlation of the two domains entails a bi perspectivism, according to which
the universe is physical, from one perspective, and spiritual, from another.
Consequently, the physical- sensory and spiritual-invisible worlds participate
in each other, creating an interrelated whole.
Recent research
has helped to clari! even further Ldvy-Bruhi’s concept of mystical
participation. Not everything in the universe is actually animated by a
non-differentiated mystical participation. Rather, participa tion is
differentiated by powers (Riviere 1989, 233-234). In light of current
scholarship we may acknowledge that the projective-participation operates in
the individual, the family, tribe, and physical nature. Each domain is unique
in itself and not reducible to a homogeneous soul. Thus, the critical revision
of Lévy-Bruhl’s law of participation makes it even more applicable to the
analysis of destiny, because Szondi emphasizes the co-related personal,
collective, and familial dimensions.
Primary
familial projection is the transfer of hereditary tendencies to the descendant,
creating a oneness, likeness, and relatedness with the ancestor. Such
projection presupposes the working of genotropism, as one unconsciously seeks
and finds relationships, particularly those of love and vocation. When the
relationship is made, continuity with the ancestral model is established.
Familial projection involves both blood and gene relatives. In its secondary
form familial projection entails a transfer of pathological hereditary traits,
whereby one pursues mate and vocational choices compulsively and without
creating real relationships.
The social
context of familial projection would be small village cultures, which have
face-to-face relationships and are organized around totems. In such societies
the individual is identified by participation in the whole family. For example,
in African tribal society when one person gets sick and is admitted to a
hospital, the entire family goes in too. The family remains with the patient
until discharged. This indicates that sickness and health are relative to the
whole family. At death one enters the realm of the living-dead, who are the
deceased family members of five generations (Mbiti 1969, 89). They dwell in
this state as long as they are
77
reality but
purely secondary. Because of the interrelatedness of all things, images are
just as real as the objects they represent.
The law of
participation also accounts for the fact that the invisible realm, which is
disclosed in dream and vision, complements the visible, sensory world. The
correlation of the two domains entails a bi perspectivism, according to which
the universe is physical, from one perspective, and spiritual, from another.
Consequently, the physical- sensory and spiritual-invisible worlds participate
in each other, creating an interrelated whole.
Recent research
has helped to clari! even further Ldvy-Bruhi’s concept of mystical
participation. Not everything in the universe is actually animated by a
non-differentiated mystical participation. Rather, participa tion is
differentiated by powers (Riviere 1989, 233-234). In light of current
scholarship we may acknowledge that the projective-participation operates in
the individual, the family, tribe, and physical nature. Each domain is unique
in itself and not reducible to a homogeneous soul. Thus, the critical revision
of Lévy-Bruhl’s law of participation makes it even more applicable to the
analysis of destiny, because Szondi emphasizes the co-related personal,
collective, and familial dimensions.
Primary
familial projection is the transfer of hereditary tendencies to the descendant,
creating a oneness, likeness, and relatedness with the ancestor. Such
projection presupposes the working of genotropism, as one unconsciously seeks
and finds relationships, particularly those of love and vocation. When the
relationship is made, continuity with the ancestral model is established.
Familial projection involves both blood and gene relatives. In its secondary
form familial projection entails a transfer of pathological hereditary traits,
whereby one pursues mate and vocational choices compulsively and without
creating real relationships.
The social
context of familial projection would be small village cultures, which have
face-to-face relationships and are organized around totems. In such societies
the individual is identified by participation in the whole family. For example,
in African tribal society when one person gets sick and is admitted to a
hospital, the entire family goes in too. The family remains with the patient
until discharged. This indicates that sickness and health are relative to the
whole family. At death one enters the realm of the living-dead, who are the
deceased family members of five generations (Mbiti 1969, 89). They dwell in this
state as long as they are
79
In summary,
both projective-participation and inflation constitute the expansive power of
the ego, the so-called “p” factor, which participates in the spiritual realm of
being. This expansive aspect of the ego is present in primal religion, so named
because it participates directly in the fundamental interrelatedness of the
universe. Primal religion comprises small communities, oral tradition, myth and
symbol, dream and vision. Primal religion normally lacks a historical founder
and is shamanistic and relatively changeless.
One example of
primal religion is the Native American tradition, wherein the sacred pipe
illustrates the expansive power of the ego, according to which
the pipe is the
universe, it is also man, and the one who fills a pipe should identif himself
with it, thus not only establishing the center of the universe, but also his
own center; he so “expands” that the six directions of space are actually
brought within himself. It is by this “expansion” that a man ceases to be a
part, a fragment, and becomes whole or holy; he shatters the illusion of
separateness (Brown 1972, 21).
On the other
hand, the expansive power of the ego is balanced by an opposite function, one
that contracts in order to deal with material reality. It is called the “k”
factor, and it comprises the next two ego phases.
(3)
Introjection is “the unconscious, original elemental striving of the ego for
possession and incorporation of value-objects, value-represent ations, and all
value-contents of the outer and inner world” (Szondi 1956, 193). Introjection
is governed by the ideal of having all, shaping not only character but also
woridview, personal and corporate ideals, vocational and ideational communities
in its primary form. Secondary introjection is the psychic mechanism present in
the formulation of pathological symptoms.
Personal
introjection comes out of one’s own experience and does not derive from
repression. One example is grief, in which the bereaved incorporates the
deceased in a clinging relationship. Hanging on to a lost object promotes a
depressive reaction, which is characterized by a love-hate ambivalence toward
the deceased. This understanding is the product of psychoanalysis.
Szondi
clarifies three other kinds of introjection. Hyper-introjection occurs when the
lost object is remembered with great photographic clarity. Detail-introjection
is the retention of the part of a lost object, such as a
80
fetish. An ad
hoc-introjection is the imprinting of a psychic trauma, resulting in a fixation.
Collective
introjection is the assimilation of objective content from outside one’s own
sphere of influence. What Jung calls the persona, the socially acquired
identity, is a collective introject. Modern capitalistic societies, which rely
on high technology, encourage introjective ego states, as in a collective
search for goods and wealth. In times of crisis collective introjection takes
the form of magic in order to satis1 a need for control.
Familial
introjection is the incorporation of properties, capabilities, and ideals
belonging to one’s forebearers. Primary familial introjection is the
assimilation of an ancestor, whom one has not experienced, into one’s
character. This presupposes genotropism and often occurs unconsciously. For
example, Jung’s #2 personality was probably an introjection of his paternal
grandfather, also named C. G. Jung, who may have been an illegitimate son of
Johann W. von Goethe (Wehr 1987, 14, 43-44). Because of Jung’s fascination for
this eighteenth century ancestor and Goethe’s Faust, he may have confused the
distinction between the familial and
collective
realms of the unconscious (1961, 35-36, 234).
Secondary
familial introjection is the acquisition of a hereditary illness or mode of
death, which also presupposes genotropism. This kind of introjection may occur
in mate and vocational selection.
(4) Negation is
“the partly unconscious, partly conscious elemental striving of the ego for
avoidance, denial, inhibition, alienation, and repression of particular claims,
representations, and ideals” (Szondi 1956, 217). Primary negation adapts to
social and moral reality. It compresses the ego for the sake of practical tasks
and protects against any threatening or one-sided ego expansion. Primary
negation involves reality testing, decision making, and assessing the value of
projection or inflation. Secondary negation is a pathological destruction of
values and reality that results in a compulsion, alienation, or catatonic
negativism.
Negation is
personal when it derives from repression. Whereas Freud makes repression
primary and negation secondary, Szondi reverses the order of priority. Personal
negation alternates between conscious adapta tion and unconscious rejection of
projections, inflation, or character opposites (e.g., femininity). With a
negativism (i.e., secondary negation) one suffers a latent need to be all and
to have all but cannot satisfy this need.
81
Collective
negation informs the commands, laws, or rules that com munities impose upon
individuals for social control. Szondi makes the proper distinction between
morality and ethics and defines them with both ego and instinctual drive
content. “Morality is the external command against specific behaviors, which
are tabooed by the community” (Szondi 1956, 224). Such a command is motivated
by the paroxysmal-hysteriform need for value, both as a claim of self worth and
as an inclination to hide one’s face. Thus, morality is a collective
prohibition of certain shameful actions (e.g., incest) in order to protect the
moral worth of the individual.
“Ethics is the
internal command, the inner law against killing and against incest love”
(Szondi 1956, 223). Ethical commands are motivated by the
paroxysmal-epileptiform need for restitution, specifically, by the Abel
tendency. Since ethical commands are internal, they have a sacred quality, as
in the monotheistic injunction: “Thus saith the Lord.” In contrast, morality
rests upon a cultural ethos rather than an experience of the sacred. Both are
grounded in the paroxysmal pattern.
Familial
negation is a consequence of genotropism. One opposes a compulsive hereditary
pattern and substitutes a free choice. By means of negation one may deny,
inhibit, or adapt to familial tendencies or become alienated from them. Since
we often carry out familial patterns uncon sciously in mate and vocational
selection, familial negation may not be too common.
Secondary
familial negation is a pathological denial, repression, or inhibition of
asocial psychopathic, criminal, or mentally ill figures in the family.
Ironically, we often manifest the characteristics of the persons we deny the
most. The relative most opposed is the relative most resembled. Such negation
can become a fixation and lead to personal disintegration.
In summary, the
ego alternates in a rhythm of expansion and contrac tion, imagination and will.
Each ego phase tends to dominate particular periods of the life cycle.
Projection is common to infancy, inflation to adolescence, introjection to
youth and middle age, and negation to maturity. As phases of the life cycle,
they presuppose a primitive psychic stratum which is found in primal religion.
Projection reflects the mystical participation in spiritual being, inflation
the exaltation of ecstatic and androgynous states, introjection character and
worldview, and negation ethical and moral behavior.
82
When one or
more of these phases becomes extreme and falls out of balance, one becomes
fixed and suffers a compulsive, destructive, or disintegrated fate. In extreme
cases disintegration brings out twilight states in individuals and anarchy in
societies. Both are flooded with cruel instinctual forces of raw, primitive
life. The task is to achieve wholeness, to integrate a free and personal ego
and live within a just democratic society.
V. The Pontifical
Ego
Szondi’s ego
psychology largely took shape during the first decade after the Second World
War. It represented a dialogue between the human and natural sciences,
particularly between depth psychology and genetics. Szondi intended to create a
bridge between these different fields. Szondi refers to the bridge as a
metaphor of the “between” (Das Zwischen). He “seeks to reveal the mysterious
‘between’ of two living beings, about which Plato earlier in The Symposium and
also currently Martin Buber have spoken. [ is] even the ‘between’ which drives
two humans to one another and maintains a double-union, a mystical union”
(Szondi 1978, 17-18).
Szondi approves
of Plato’s argument that “what belongs to us by nature has been shown to be
something we needs must befriend” (Lysis 222A, Loeb). In Szondi’s reading of
Plato, we love one another because we share the same nature. Our common nature
is defined as gene-relatedness (Szondi 1978, 259).
Similarly, in
The Symposium Plato narrates mythically that human nature was originally
three-fold, comprising man, woman, and a union of the two. The latter was
primal humankind, the androgyne, a round being with one head, two faces, four
hands, four feet, and so forth. This primal being was murdered by Zeus because
of its rebellious spirit. Ever since, each half has been looking for the other.
“Thus anciently is mutual love ingrained in mankind, reassembling our early
estate and endeavoring to combine two in one and heal the human sore”
(Symposium 191D, Loeb). Hence, love is a reunion of separated relatives, who
are, as Szondi would say, gene-related.
83
Szondi cites
Buber in many places, but a revealing discussion is found in the Ego Analysis.
Describing faith as union, Szondi explains that
“participation
also enables only the encounter, only the meeting, only the dialogical
conversation with the spirit in the sense of Martin Buber” (1956, 519). When
the human and divine meet in religious experience, they retain their integrity.
The encounter has an otherness, in which one’s identity is not dissolved. Human
and divine are inseparable but unique.
These
references to Plato and Buber clarify Szondi’s understanding of human and
religious experience. Unification of the ego realizes the essential power of
being through participation and achieves transcendence. Integration,
participation, and transcendence signify the highest develop ment of the ego,
the union of psychic opposites. This exalted state of fulfillment is
represented in the concept of the metaphysical or pontifical ego (Pontifex
Ich). The term Pontifex derives from the Latin words for bridge (pons) and for
making (facere). Thus, the pontifical ego is that of the whole person, the
fully relational self, which in the fullness of its power, participates in the
realm of spirit. This high state of being is represented in the metaphysical
image of the bridge of opposites.
The concept of
the pontifical ego provides a framework for a theory of personality
development, a transpersonal psychology of being, and a mystical vision of religious
experience (BUrgi-Meyer 1988). The central statement of the transpersonal ego
psychology is as follows: “The ego transcends and moves itself as trans-real in
a participation-projective world dimension of Being, which we will briefly name
the ‘-dimension. This i ‘-dimension is the fourth dimension, in which the
p5yche may extend itself-in opposition to the body” (Szondi 1956, 464). As
attested by one of his students, Szondi had presented this idea in a lecture in
ZUrich in 1947 (BUrgi-Meyer
1989, 43).
Szondi goes on
to explain that the term dimension consists of an extension of the body in
space, according to length, breadth, and height, and of the succession of time.
Ordinary reality is shaped by the extensive continuum of space-time, wherein
causality operates. The spatio-temporal, causal dimension comprises the bounded
or subjective aspect of the ego. Let us call this the perspectival ego whose
content is immanent consciousness.
In its
pontifical aspect the ego transcends the ordinary space-time, causal dimension
and participates in a space-less, time-less, and final state.
84
These qualities
of finality lie as potentials in the unconscious. They are also found in
contemporary physics, which conceives of fundamental reality without matter and
subject-object forms. Fundamental reality is empty, radiant energy which
enfolds all forms. To participate in this fundamental radiant being is not to
be deluded pathologically but to be whole.
Szondi’s
reference to physics means relativistic-quantum theory. The universe is an
inseparable whole, a dynamic process, in which all opposites unite, as in the
wave-particle aspects of matter, for example. The wholeness of reality is
knowable only through participation, and conceptual descriptions are products
of projection. The pontifical ego is a primal wholeness, which is empty of
particularate space-time causal forms. It includes the possibility of pure
experience, universal relativity of all space-time regions, and translocal and
transcausal relationships. Thus, ful fillment of the pontifical ego manifests a
co-participation of self and fundamental reality.
VI. Sources of
the Ego Psychology
As stated
above, Szondi’s ego psychology was heavily influenced by Hinduism. His first
literary reference to Hinduism appeared in a 1943 Hungarian manuscript
(BUrgi-Meyer 1988, 13). He compares the expansive power of the ego, the “p”
function, to the ahamkara, a striving for power that can come under the spell
of illusion. Szondi also compares the con tractive power of the ego, the “k”
function, to the mahanatman, which incorporates the gross, material world.
The next
reference to Hinduism appeared in his pivotal essay “Human kind and Destiny”
(1954b) wherein he shifts to depth psychology. He proposes that the concept of
the pontifical ego is the answer to the old question of the Upanishads: “What
is your ego?” Szondi describes the pontifical ego as the distributor of power,
organizer, administrator, socializer, sublimator, individualizer, and
humanizer. Szondi goes on to describe the ego as a union of opposites; for
example...”the ego is neither spirit nor nature; it is the bridge between
spirit and drive-nature” (1954, 22) and so forth. The antitheses are repeated
and expanded in the Ego Analysis (1956, 156-157).
86
function. The
Gita also accounts for the pathology of projection: “But he who is deluded by
egoism (ahamkara) thinks: ‘I am the doer.” (3.27).
Szondi’s appeal
to Buber’s ideas is also more consistent with post Vedanta Hinduism. Both
Szondi and Buber qualify the pure mystical experience with a sense of
otherness. Early in his career Buber was attracted to Vedanta, but he went
beyond its monism to his mature I-Thou teaching, which reflected Jewish
Hasidism (Friedman 1976, 413-414). According to Buber, the immediate experience
of relatedness discloses the nature of fundamental reality.
Like the
Bhagavad Gita Hasidism also recognizes a gap between the divine and the human,
and it bridges the gap by withdrawing from the sensory realm and uniting with
God in a mysticism of prayer. The Hasidic master Rabbi Nachman of Bratslav
teaches: “The entire world is a very narrow bridge; the main thing is to have
no fear” (Witztum, et.al., 1990, 125). Historically, Hasidism depended upon
Platonic metaphysics, wherein the worlds of light and darkness are distinct but
share a dynamic unity (Scholem 1987, 102-103, 316).
In the Platonic
tradition the ultimate and sensory realms, those of light and darkness, unite
in the intermediate world (Rep. X, 614C; Statesm. 309C; Tim. 90A) The
intermediate world is the “between”, which is known in seizure states,
expressed in twilight images, and defined only by negation (Conze 1974).
Significantly, the setting of the Upanishads is the way of the forest. The
forest is secret, dark, and mysterious, and it symbolizes a twilight state, a
lowered threshold of consciousness, as experienced through a shock event.
Therefore, the
concept of the pontifical ego is a new version of the Platonic intermediate
world. The union of the ultimate and sensory realms resonates with the
metaphysics of Hinduism and Hasidism. However, the ego phase of
projective-participation refutes both monistic and dualistic conceptions and
faithfully represents the relational vision of historic Judaism. Consequently,
the image of atnzan as “bridge” informs the concept of the pontifical ego
metaphorically rather than categorically.
VII. Forms of
Pathological Participation
As a union of
psychic antitheses, the pontifical ego displaces the space-time-causal realm
and participates in an “other” domain of spirit.
Positing this
kind of ego psychology inevitably raises the following question: What is the
difference between normal and abnormal concep tions of reality?
When the primal
drive for participation is not fulfilled, delusion obtains. Delusion (Wahn) is
a misappropriated power of being (Szondi 1956, 412). It substitutes for real
relatedness and takes such common forms as addiction, neurosis, psychosis, and
magical speculation. These substitutes mean that one lacks personal integration
and suffers powerless ness. The kinds of delusion correspond to the four basic
ego phases. These delusions can occur individually or collectively,
simultaneously or sequentially. Here Szondi goes beyond Freud who confines
delusion to projection.
(1)
Projection-delusion is “the product of an ego function which is characterized
by a pathological power distribution and an unreal mode of participation”
(Szondi 1956, 425). One externalizes one’s own power onto someone or something
else, making the object omnipotent. A mutual hate relation arises between
subject and object. When the transfer is total without any relatedness,
paranoia results. The projection could be mixed with the Cain homicidal intent
and be directed toward others or towards oneself depressively or compulsively.
Underlying
projection-delusion is the inability to be alone. Some popular cultural forms
of this delusion are astrology, superstitition, and non-scientific
parapsychology. This type accounts for 32.2% of all delusions (Szondi 1956,
458). To achieve genuine relatedness, one must go beyond self-interest. Szondi
believes that real transcendence is the only cure for pathological narcissism.
In this context
Szondi refers to a psychological study conducted in Lambarene, Africa, by Emmerich Percy, a physician working
with Albert Schweitzer (1956, 170). Percy found that among native Africans the
dominant ego phase was total projection. This could be interpreted as a
mystical, archaic, or autistic ego, on the one hand, or an undiagnosed
schizophrenia, on the other. However, schizophrenic symptoms do not appear in
these people, because their society satisfies the need for participation, the
“p” function. Participation is achieved by identi1 with plants, animals, and
ancestors. Hence, a person with an autistic ego would be normal in tribal
society and primal religion but abnormal in modern civilization.
87
88
(2)
Inflation-delusion doubles one’s power by expressing unconsciously and
separately the psychic antitheses of the ego (Szondi 1956, 436). The frequency
is 10.5%. Some common forms are megalomania, erotomania, and transvestitism.
Mythologies of androgyny, as in the primal being who is both male and female,
are examples. Szondi cites a case of a hebe phrenic schizophrenic, for whom the
left arm was the wife and the right the husband (1956, 481). With the
inflation-delusion the patient could be both and love both.
(3)
Introjection-delusion is the desire to possess everything, a narcissism of
having (Szondi 1956, 440). Behind the introjection lies a strong sense of guilt.
One example is the fetish, which gives one a magical omnipotence or
narcissistic sexual identity. Introjection-delusion often appears at the
beginning and end of a psychosis as a cosmic grandeur, feeling of persecution,
sexual powers, or pedantic orderliness. The frequency is 2.2%. Such delusion
informs materialism, rationalism, positivism, and any other worldview that
denies transcendence.
(4)
Negation-delusion is the total devaluation of the powers of being and having
(Szondi 1956, 443). Total devaluation creates a negativism and tends to be
destructive. The clinical symptoms are feelings of worthless ness, illusory
hypochondria, addiction, and suicidal and homicidal mania. The frequency is
22.7%. Thus, the negation-delusion is nearly as common as the projective. Yet,
each is unique. With projection-delusion one has no ideals, but with
negation-delusion no more ideals.
VIII.
Participation Theory of Dreams
Delusion is
related to dreaming in the sense that both go beyond the limits of ordinary,
space-time, causal reality. The climax of the dream comes when the dreamer, for
a brief moment, experiences a wholeness. Szondi calls this momentary oneness
“autogenic participation”. Every dream is a nightly search for wholeness, for
participation in the side of the personality that is not manifest in waking
consciousness. The dormant half is the background self (Hinterganger). Though
separated by waking consciousness, the background self is essentially related
to the foreground self (Vorderganger), with which it unites in the dream. In
the totality of the dream time is relativized. Dreams may reflect past or
future or be causal or final.
89
In the human
life cycle a splitting of the foreground and background selves usually occurs
about ages three or four. After that period, stronger drive impulses become
repressed and are reduced to the background self. The mechanism of repression
is the waking consciousness in the perspec tival ego. The background and
foreground selves assume a contrary role, creating a sharp polarity. For
example, with an inhibited foreground self the background is autistic, and with
a sexually feminine foreground, the background is sadistically aggressive.
One of Szondi’s
patients illustrates such polarity. In Case #1 a 55 year old businessman appears
to be a “Don Juan” type (1956, 233-234, 473-474). He has a brother, a passive
homosexual, who died prematurely. The patient represses his femininity, so as
not to repeat the sad fate of his homosexual brother. Yet he has a constantly
recurring dream, in which he is a wife in bed with a Don Juan. In the dream the
wife represents the background, Don Juan the foreground. The purpose of the
repression is familial negation, to avoid the brother’s pattern of behavior.
The male- female images mean that the dream work takes an inflative form.
Szondi’s theory
also accounts for ancestral dreams, visions, and hallucinations. Case #9
concerns a 29 year old, female organist, who is a psychiatric patient. She has
hallucinations in which her grandmother appears, and, behind her, the ancestors
are standing. From this group a voice speaks: “Be brave, as I was brave, and
the ancestors were brave”
(1956, 482).
Case #10 is
about a 55 year old, female mathematician, who has a series of five long
visions in which her ancestors appear. She describes the first one as follows:
I had the image
that a deep stream of blood wandered through the streets with me. I wandered in
this stream which was as high as a man. Suddenly, I became ill with high fever
and rhinitis, because this ancestral blood stream was in me, and I suffocated
in it. The only thing I knew is Lthat] the ancestral blood had saved me. I
believe I was previously dead (1956, 482).
The patient
hated her mother but loved her father. The mother suffered depression and had to
be hospitalized for paranoid ideation. The more sick the mother became, the
more she was repressed in the mind of the daughter. Thus, the mother
represented the background self of the patient, as disclosed in the second
vision: “I found her in a dark cave,
90
whose walls
were bordered with dark breasts out of which milk dripped.” Her mother appeared
to be in a death-like condition. The patient continued: “I sat still...on the
bed, while out of the depths of the cave came a procession of ancestors” (1956,
483).
The patient
repressed this imagery for twelve years, during which time the visions changed
form. The mother and father grew younger, becoming bride and groom again. In
the third vision the mother brings four candles, sets them in a cross-shaped
holder, while their flames dance. Then in the fourth vision the mother holds a
two and one half year old child, who is the patient as an infant. The mother
speaks to the girl: “Now even you must drink, because you are also my child,
just as I am your mother and child.’ I too drink from her breast and feel a
stream of new life in me. I think: This at last is the means of healing. I need
nothing more.” In the same vision the patient realizes that the union with the
mother is a ritual of renewal, which is symbolized by the drinking of the
breast milk and the dancing of the candle flames. The patient knows she is
whole, as symbol ized by the four candles which are an archetypal quaternity,
representing wholeness.
Finally, in the
fifth vision the patient understands that her original repression of the hated
mother was caused by familial anxiety. It was the anxiety that she would suffer
the same ill fate that plagued her mother; so she denied her maternal heredity:
“Anxiety in the face of destiny, which was carried by the blood of the
ancestors and was pre-existent. Up to my 48th year I had defended against this
fate by negation of the blood” (1956, 485).
The few brief
excerpts from these visions demonstrate that the personal, collective, and
familial realms of the unconscious co-act. The personal informs the
mother-child conflict, the collective is in the healing images and archetypal
quaternity, and the familial is in the flow of the ancestral blood. The
achievement of wholeness in the patient indicates that the visions facilitate
autogenic participation. They are a form of participation therapy.
To explain the
dynamics of dream work Szondi employs metaphors from the theatre. The dream is
the stage, the waking ego the stage director. The background self is expressed
through personal, collective, and/or familial content. The waking
consciousness, embodied in the foreground self, chooses the content and directs
the play.
91
Falling asleep
is the same as the curtain rising. The opening scenes present the existential
possibilities in the destiny of the dreamer. As sleep moves through its cycles,
the ego crosses a threshold, proceeding from the ordinary space-time world to
the dream world. The waking ego recedes, becomes passive, and watches the
stage. Personal, collective, and familial figures step out of the background as
actors. They are symbols whose identities are normally hidden and barred from
appearing in public. The play comes to a climax, uniting the psyche in a
participation mystique. The drama ends, as the ego awakens to the light of day.
IX.
Participation Theory of Faith
Szondi’s ego
psychology culminates in a theory of faith. As a thera pist, Szondi learned
that humankind has a fundamental religious need which, if not fulfilled,
deteriorates into mental illness. The human need for faith is just as basic as
that for contact or sexuality. In a revealing lecture, published posthumously,
Szondi describes faith as the “royal road” to humanization (1954a, 1989, 53).
In the Ego
Analysis Szondi poses the issue of faith in terms of illusion, in as much as
Freud and Eugen Bleuler had already identified the two. Freud had proclaimed
faith to be an illusion, and similarly Bleuler had regarded illusion as the
physiological equivalent of faith. We note that neo-Freudian psychology of
religion continues to speak of illusion, but defines it as a creative reality
much like that of art (Rizzuto 1979).
Szondi treats
the issue philosophically by arguing that the relationship between faith and
illusion depends upon a prior woridview. In his view, Freud and Bleuler were
both monists and their approach to life was essentially materialistic. They
were religious, but the “god” whom they revered was natural science. They were
great monotheists of natural science. Szondi contends that physical nature does
not exhaust reality but is a half-world; likewise, spirit alone is also a
half-world. Neither nature nor spirit constitute reality. Rather both nature
and spirit comprise reality. Thus, the theory of reality, or metaphysics, can
be neither monist nor dualist but relational. Only in the relation of nature
and spirit may reality be conceived, and this conception is achieved by real
participation.
92
Faith is a
state of integrated wholeness, a participation in the full nature of being. In
contrast, illusion is an extension of the perspectival ego or an object onto a
boundless plane in the sense of a totalism. There is no genuine encounter, no
otherness. What appears to be other is purely negative, evil, or unreal. Under
illusion the ego suffers powerless ness. It splits and disintegrates.
The German term
for faith (Glaube) may be translated as faith or belief. Szondi would prefer
faith, and he illustrates its quality etymolog ically. The Indo-Germanic root
of Glauben is “leubh,” which means “to praise;” the praise is directed toward
the future (Szondi 1956, 514). Faith as praise is positive, mystical, and
continuous, and this quality is not determined by reason. Faith belongs to the
realm of spirit.
As a spiritual
function, faith has two psychological aspects. On the one hand, faith involves
a transfer of one’s own power onto God, thereby achieving a centered self. In
this relationship the power of being becomes stronger than the power of having.
On the other hand, the law of participation is fulfilled at the highest level
of reality. This spiritual maturity is a fulfillment of the primal wholeness,
which is latent in the original mother-child, dual-union.
The model of
faith is the pontifical ego. In this state one is trans parent to the divine as
well as fully human and fully personal. It is a mystical or pure experience,
bridging this world and the other world. The pontifical ego activates the
constitutive ego phases, other than the projective, in three basic aspects of
religious experience: (1) symbolization through myth, dream, and vision
(primaly inflation); (2) development of woridview, character, and sacramental
object (primary introjection); and (3) adaptation by means of morality and
ethics (primary negation). These three functions of religious experience are
distinctive modes of participa tion in the realm of spirit.
Finally, faith
is destiny. God or the realm of spirit is both “subject” and “object” of
existential choice. When the choice of the object is compulsive,
environmentally-conditioned, or purely rational, faith dimin ishes, as does
one’s own personal humanity. One becomes dehumanized and may suffer a variety
of mental disorders, such as total delusion, an autistic-undisciplined ego
possessed by occult forces, hypochondria, or the obsessive superstition of
religious orthodoxy. These conditions betray a dread of death, and they are
inadequate defenses against basic anxiety.
93
In summary,
fate consists of (1) heredity, (2) instinctual drives, (3) social conditioning,
and (4) the influential ideas of the prevailing culture. Taken together, they
are a half-world and a one-dimensional force. They encourage compulsive,
genotropic choices and inhibit the spiritual drive for participation. In
contrast, freedom emerges in (1) the perspectival ego and (2) the pontifical
ego. The perspectival ego makes free choices, and the pontifical ego exalts the
“p” function, the projective-participatory power of being, and gains wholeness.
Since we can never escape the animal brain, freedom always occurs in nature,
amid genes and ancestors. Therefore, freedom is destiny. In the complementary
wholeness of freedom and destiny we face the world directly, confronting
tragedy and ambiguity. In the realm of destiny death befalls us not as a threat
but as a personal choice.
95
Chapter Five:
Struggle Against the Ancestor
I. Ground of
the Psyche
The last major
work in Szondi’s system appeared in 1963, and it dealt with therapy. He
formulated his method of therapy in dialogue with those of other psychologists.
For example, the Freudian conception of the psyche is microscopic, anatomical,
topographical, and mechanistic. The Jungian comprises levels of consciousness
and unconsciousness, in which the psychic totality is partly identical to the
physical continuum of the universe.
In Szondi’s
view both Freud and Jung are monists. The struggle between the Freudian and
Jungian schools illustrates the splitting of the psyche into subjective and
objective domains. The historic splitting has led to attempts by various
psychologies to recover the wholeness of the psyche. Szondi’s analysis of
destiny is one of the most comprehensive formulations of wholeness.
Szondi has
established a therapeutic model based upon functional dependencies. Some
examples are the concepts of the familial unconscious and the pontifical ego.
These units are relational in the sense that they represent experiences of
wholeness and dialectical in that they comprise paired contents. Instead of
reducing the psyche to a single energy source, the libido, as Freud does,
Szondi shows that the hereditary drives have their own energies. Thus, the
psyche in its conscious and unconscious domains is a plenitude of diverse
energies.
Freud also
conceived of the conscious and unconscious as psychic qualities, which are
known only through signs or symptoms. Szondi argues that such qualities could
only be classified as vegetative or reflective but not as psychic. He contends
that “the essence of the psychic is the impulse of the life function toward
freedom” (Szondi 1963a, 33). Conscious and unconscious are stations on the road
to freedom. The achievement of
96
freedom
involves a genuine wholeness, a real humanization, and not simply an adjustment
to physical reality.
To account for
the dynamics of freedom Szondi uses a well-known term from German idealism.
Friedrich Wilhelm von Schelling conceived of absolute freedom as the Ungrund.
This German term designates the absolute or basic ground of being. The Ungrund
is the realm of absolute non being. It is addressed only by way of negation or
by the negative theology.
Szondi
translates grund as “depth” and “end;” so the Ungyund means “the deepest
place.” Hence, the absolute provides the dimension of depth for psychology and
grounds all distinctions and dualities. More precisely, the Ungrund is the
unconscious. Szondi makes this claim in light of Freud’s belief that the
unconscious knows no contradiction, negation, doubt, or opposites but that
these are present in consciousness. Such characteristics presuppose an absolute
depth or ground. The unconscious knows no contradiction because the freedom of
the Ungrund is itself unconscious.
Throughout this
discussion Szondi employs two terms, the Ungrund and the Urgrund, as though
they were interchangeable (1963a, 34-35). This usage raises a problem in the
original German tradition. Alexandre Koyre has shown that Schelling confused
Ungrund Urgrund, and Abgrund and unnecessarily imputed darkness to each (1968,
281). The term Ungrund was introduced by Jacob Boehme and understood simply as
the “Divine Nothingness” or absolute without determination or distinction.
These German
philosophers used the notion of Ungrund to explain the origin of being. This
presupposes that the explanatory principle of being be preceded by its
opposite, such as a notion of nonbeing or nothingness. Such an approach is
common to the NeoplatOflic tradition and to the circles of medieval Judaism
that produced the Kabbalah. In the Kabbalab the source of all being is the
ultimate nothingness, the primordial will toward being, which is the same as
Boehme’S Ungrund (Scholem 1987, 459). Thus, Szondi’S understanding of the
unconscious reflects the joint influences of the Platonic, Jewish, and German
philosophical traditions.
Szondi finds in
the unconscious or Ungrund a drive toward transcen dence, toward a conscious
wholeness. The Ungrund is nothing explicit, but it projects the wholeness of
being as a plenitude of energy that pervades the apparent emptiness of the
universe (Bohm 1983, 210). The most
compelling
manifestations toward being (“p” factor) a former expands the self thr self
through the will. TI pontifical ego, in which im psychic unity. One experiei
nature of the universe as an are dissolved in an ultimat
II. Tb
The fundamental
movefl is illustrated concretely in in dialogue with Freud ar Enlightenment. It
seeks t deliver him or her from in
Psychoanalysis
deals objectivity of inner and ou subjective psychological ma reality as
defined by social physical world. Therapy o repression as an empirical of the
patient. The proc model of the psyche.
Szondi’s
judgment of t further reinforced by the hi and thanatos, cannot be liii the
eighteenth century hava forces of nature requiring d In the Enlightenment age r
containing instinctual force
Szondi doubts
that repri ology. Just to remove neu early childhood trauma, da concentrating
on symptoms a whole person who bears in the familial unconscic
97
compelling
manifestations of freedom in human existence are the drive toward being (“p”
factor) and the drive toward having (“k” factor). The former expands the self
through the imagination, the latter compresses the self through the will. The
attainment of freedom culminates in the pontifical ego, in which imagination
and will are elevated to the highest psychic unity. One experiences a transcendent
integration and knows the nature of the universe as an inseparable wholeness,
wherein all distinctions are dissolved in an ultimate nothingness.
II. Therapeutic
Principles
The fundamental
movement toward freedom, which informs psychic life, is illustrated concretely
in therapy. Szondi explains his method of therapy in dialogue with Freud and
says that psychoanalysis descends from the Enlightenment. It seeks to cultivate
a pure insight in the patient and to deliver him or her from infantile
dependence and the need for guilt.
Psychoanalysis
deals with empirical reality, which comprises the objectivity of inner and
outer perceptions. The Freudian analyst collects subjective psychological
materials and evaluates them in terms of objective reality as defined by social
consensus. Objective reality is the external, physical world. Therapy consists
of a search for early childhood needs, repression as an empirical fact, and the
fate of the repression in the life of the patient. The procedure rests upon a
linear, logical, and causal model of the psyche.
Szondi’s
judgment of the Enlightenment origins of psychoanalysis is further reinforced
by the historical fact that the life and death drives, eros and t/zanatos,
cannot be linked before the eighteenth century. Only since the eighteenth
century have sex and death been viewed together as primal forces of nature
requiring defenses and sublimation (Aries 1981, 392-394). In the Enlightenment
age nature was discovered as an independent order, containing instinctual
forces that challenged human mastery.
Szondi doubts
that repression is a uniform causal factor in psychopath ology. Just to remove
neurotic symptoms, caused by the repression of an early childhood trauma, does
not guarantee genuine healing. Instead of concentrating on symptoms as psychic
objects, Szondi views the patient as a whole person who bears several
existential possibilities, which are latent in the familial unconscious. The
key to healing is the personal
98
relationship
between patient and therapist. The task of the therapist is to maintain moral
integrity and to treat the patient as a responsible being, as an end in himself
or herself.
Szondi lays
down a series of fundamental therapeutic principles (1963a, 56-96). Stating
these helps to clari1 further his view of the family and the experience of
freedom. The first principle is that psychoanalysis grasps only a part of human
destiny and not the whole. For Freud destiny is determined mainly by an
obsessional neurosis, traumatically acquired from an unresolved Oedipus
complex. As Szondi’s many case studies show, fatefully disordered lives are due
to the complex interaction of heredity, biological drives, and the social and
intellectual conditioning and not simply to neurosis.
The second and
third principles together entail a distinction between pathogenesis and
etiology. As stated in chapter one, this distinction has been confirmed by
contemporary genetics. Pathogenesis means the manifestation of a disorder and
etiology its cause. The psychoanalytic preoccupation with early childhood
virtually confuses the two. Although early childhood may be the time of the
onset of an illness, it may not necessarily be the cause. The clinical reason
is that childhood traumas do not lead to neuroses or psychoses in all persons. A
trauma is pathogenic only if the victim carries a specific tendency toward a
disorder. The cause derives from the genes, and early childhood simply
manifests the hereditary pattern.
The fourth
principle involves a distinction between instinctual drive dreams and ancestral
dreams. The former display content from the personal unconscious, which is
usually sexual and shaped by repression. The Freudian analyst interprets dreams
as though they were forms of literature portraying hidden sexual themes, The
latter express hereditary tendencies as carried by figures in the familial
unconscious, such as epileptic or schizophrenic ancestors.
The fifth
principle states that ancestral claims originating in family heredity and
appearing in dreams are acted out by the patient. One does not remember them
but simply enacts them. Consequently, the Freudian method of recollection,
repetition, and working through repressed content does not apply to ancestral
claims, Confrontation with enacted but unremembered impulses requires a unique
approach to therapy, which will be discussed in the next section.
99
The sixth
principle mandates two tasks. One is that psychoanalytically the therapist
concentrates on the defense and sublimation of the threaten ing unconscious
impulse. Szondi observes this practice, when it fits the situation, which is
usually at the beginning of a therapeutic course. The other is that in the
familial phase, when hereditary pathologies are uncovered, vocational therapy
may be indicated. Vocational choices may be recommended as means of sublimation
of hereditary disturbances. However, vocational therapy is more easily done
with younger patients or with those who suffer relatively mild disorders rather
than with pre psychotics or psychotics. The familial or vocational stage of
therapy is followed by the ego phase, when the therapist helps the patient
achieve the faith function. The appeal to faith is based upon one’s experience
and not theology.
Finally, the
seventh principle clarifies the goal of therapy. The aim is to liberate and to
humanize the patient. The end is not a static state but an on-going process.
Humanization is not measured by the absence of symptoms; for even neurotics are
capable of fulfillment. Humanization includes the capacity to make free choices,
regardless of one’s early childhood or neurotic symptoms.
Szondi’s book
on therapy was concluded with a reference to Martin Luther (1963a, 527). More
precisely, Szondi’s clinical distinction between acting and remembering
parallels exactly Luther’s dilemma as a young Augustinian monk. He had trouble
receiving the sacrament of penance, because he could not remember his sins
(Bainton 1950, 55-56). If he could not remember, he could not confess; and if
he could not confess, he could not be forgiven. He acted as though he were a
sinner, as though he were possessed by the wrath of God. Luther’s superior
counseled him simply to love God, but he wondered how he could love a God of
wrath. Luther suffered a paroxysmal splitting, which was resolved in the justifica
tion by faith. Thus, the struggles of the young Luther serve as a prototype of
psychoshock therapy.
100
III.
Psychoshock Therapy
The
aforementioned principles indicate two levels of therapeutic activity.
Psychoanalysis is a direct type, utilizing free association and recollection to
uncover unconscious resistance and to bring repressed content into
consciousness. Some of the psychoanalytic factors of resistance are repression,
transference, secondary gains of illness, repeti tion-compulsion, and guilt and
the need for punishment.
The other,
Szondi’s psychoshock therapy, is the indirect kind. He recognizes the fact that
sometimes patients go through psychoanalytic treatment but do not improve.
Their symptoms may return after a period
remission or
they may not be able to make sound existential decisions. Despite completing a
therapeutic program, they remain fatefully disordered. The reason is that
genotropism causes the unconscious resistance. Hereditary patterns in the
familial unconscious are repressed, and yet they influence one’s life.
The task of the
therapist is to detect the resistance, including perversions, hallucinations,
and delusions, and trace them to familial figures. The resistances could be
called “ancestral reminiscences.” However, these familial patterns may not be
uncovered easily, so the therapist must wait patiently for them to appear,
often for years. Metaphorically speaking, the therapist awaits the return of
the ancestor. Discernment of the familial patterns may be aided by psychological
testing and by construction of a genealogy.
Getting at
hereditary patterns requires the psychoshock technique. The term illustrates
the fact that therapy is a shock event. This method grew Out of Szondi’s
experimental work in 1945, following his liberation from Bergen-Belsen
Concentration Camp. He admits that he and other psychiatrists had unpleasant
feelings when treating patients with electro shock therapy. He wondered if a
vigorous psychiatric confrontation on the couch might have the same dramatic impact
as electricity.
Originally, he
experimented on psychopathic addicts and paranoid and catatonic schizophrenics.
Over a span of ten years he received encouraging results from his work. He
found the technique mainly appropriate to prepsychotics and early
schizophrenics in institutional settings but not so much to other patients. To
do the psychoshock technique the therapist
101
must accept his
or her own family background and forms of sublimation. One must come to terms
with one’s own ancestors.
One illustration
of psychoshock therapy is provided in the following case (Szondi, Moser, and
Webb 1959, 271-292; Szondi 1963a, 171-187). It deals with a 45 year old bank
official who has excellent financial ability. Until age 37 he had no
relationships with women. However, his first love affair was with a
paranoid-hysteriform woman who was 60 years old or 23 years older than he. The
relationship lasted two years, and it gave him considerable pleasure. He wanted
to marry this woman, but her son intervened and dissuaded him from doing so.
The son explained that such a marriage would not be normal and that he should
enter therapy with a Jungian analyst.
The man agreed.
The Jungian analyst, a female, helped him to realize that the woman served as a
mother figure and that he should separate from her. When the man dissolved the
relationship, therapy came to an end. Following therapy, however, the man had
another affair with a woman who was even older than the first one. Meanwhile,
he was completely impotent toward younger women. The Jungian analyst advised
him to enter therapy with a male psychiatrist, who would be a father figure and
help build up his masculinity. He joined Szondi in a therapeutic course, which
involved 101 two hour sessions over a span of 15 months, including analysis of
152 dreams.
Szondi
conducted the psychoanalytic phase in accord with the Freudian method. The
patient lay on the couch and spoke, while the therapist listened passively.
During this phase, the patient became aware of the following symptoms.
First, he has a
strong incestuous bond with his mother and sister. The patient is the youngest
of four siblings, having one sister and two older brothers. The incestuous
aspect appears in dream #11: “An older woman had said to me in a dream, I
should not tell her husband. Yet I thought ‘But I have still loved my mother.”
(1963a, .172) Dream #6 recalls a situation from the time he was six years old:
“My father comes home from military service. I lay on my mother and sought her
breast. The sister, who is six years older, lay in another bed and laughed at
me with mother.” In dream #18 he desires to sleep with his sister but is
prevented from doing so by the mother. The father appears as a “steer-man” and
makes demands upon his daughter.
102
Second, many
dreams evoke childhood anxiety, featuring, for example, the threatening
appearance of his father as a red steer. Third, pre-genital impulses, such as
anality, exhibitionism, and anal-sadism are brought out. Fourth, several dreams
indicate repressed homosexuality, including erotic experiences with the brother
and attachment to the father.
At the end of
the first series of psychoanalytic dreams, the patient summarizes his own
conclusions as follows. He realizes his attachment to his mother, resulting in
various degrees of homosexual or bisexual feelings. The homosexuality is
represented by the brother, which creates anxiety. The patient has many
fantasies as a Don Juan type, yet he knows that he would fail in this role. He
fears encounters with women, intercourse, and pregnancy. He wishes to be more
masculine toward women than he actually is.
In his dreams
the figure of the mother pushes him toward a career and toward relationships
with specific women. The father, both as a human and as a red steer, represents
his own instinctual drive nature. The mother has given religion to the father
as a means of control for the drives and for his instability. The patient feels
anxiety about his mas culinity and has discovered a masochistic side of
himself. When faced with problems, he has a tendency to become ill. He also
realizes that the analyst is a substitute for the father. Hence, transference
occurs.
The second
series of dreams, while still in the psychoanalytic phase, concerns the man’s
first love, the 60 year old woman. The patient explains that he has experienced
an intense, ecstatic love with her: “An unheard-of stimulation, I was in
another world, I felt as if something were flowing into me from God.... I
experienced it not as sexual, but as something numinous” (1963a, 73). However,
he learns of the incestuous quality of this love, when in a dream the beloved
takes on the features of his mother.
He writes about
this discovery on October 9, 1953: “I was impressed- and still am-by the clear presentation of the
incestuous and homosexual stages of development, through which every man has to
go instinctually, with the underpinning of the primitive cultures” (1963a,
174). He understands that his homosexual tendency and impotence toward younger
women are consequences of his mother fixation.
Within two
months of the beginning of his analysis with Szondi his impotence disappeared
completely. He renounced his incestuous desires and developed a normal
relationship with a woman who was about 30
103
years old. He
sustained the relationship for more than one year, until traveling to a foreign
country where he became the head of a branch bank. Although the psychoanalysis
had ended, Szondi knew that the analysis had not. The patient reported
disturbing symptoms through both dreams and free association. These symptoms
derived from familial figures.
Szondi resumed
analysis with the patient in a second phase, the familial. Szondi believes that
the hereditary roots of character and behavior are so strong that the patient
should not be confronted with them in the early stages of therapy. The familial
phase consists of a direct encounter of the ancestors, constructing a
genealogy, and taking psycholog ical tests.
In the first
part of the familial therapy the patient experiences parox ysmal-epileptoid
relatives. For example, a stutterer appears in dream #19:
“Your brother
M. had a brother, who stutters. I am astonished and ask, what is his name?
‘Hans’ was the answer” (1963a, 175). Indeed, the family has a member, who had
stuttered earlier in his life.
In a session on
the couch the patient feels the onset of an epileptic aura. This occurs after
he explains that a cousin of his father, the son of a railway employee, had
killed a friend in college during a prank. The patient becomes distracted by reference
to the murder. Szondi explains that epileptoid states may come out, when
associations with violent weapons, knives, swords, or daggers, are made.
The patient
also has dreams about other people who suffer epileptic seizures. He cites
dream #30 as an example: “Now visualize a young man with black hair lying on
the floor. He then added: He reminds me of an epileptic schoolmate B. He says
to me (in the dream) he has just had a choking attack.” In the preceding dream,
#29, he sees his maternal aunt K., lying dead as a result of an epileptic
seizure. His brother is present. The patient explains that this aunt had always
excited him sexually and that his brother was a rival for her affection.
The patient
goes on to reveal dream #149: “I lay on the couch and asked my mother, who
stood nearby, whether she had ever had an epileptic seizure. She answered:
‘When I was 18, I had had one, and perhaps there is still another one.’ And
after a pause she continued: ‘also the female chocolate stormer.’ ‘Chocolate
stormer?’ I looked at her questioningly. Then I asked further: And do you know,
mother, what breaks through in
104
an epileptic
seizure?’ And I answered myself: a murderer! - She looked at me shocked. Yes, a
killer, I repeated” (1963a, 176).
The patient
acknowledges that his mother is either mildly or manifestly epileptic. In fact,
both she and her brother had had periods of religious ecstasy with momentary
absences. In dream #149 there is the unconscious knowledge that the patient’s
first love, the 60 year old woman, is an epileptic carrier and that she is
symbolized as the “chocolate stormer.” When the genealogy was compiled, the
patient learned that this woman was the daughter of an epileptic pharmacist.
The family tree even contains a male relative, the father’s cousin noted above,
who was a murderer. Another relative, a theologian, had told the patient some
time before that a distant ancestor had been beheaded for poisoning his wife
shortly after their marriage.
Szondi
discloses to the patient, at this point in the therapy, the hidden presence of
epileptics and affect killers in the familial unconscious. Szondi explains the
latent struggle between the Cain and Abel tendencies in human nature. In this
case, the latent Cain impulse had existed in a repressed form, even before the
beginning of the familial phase of therapy. For example, the patient had
written a paper on November 12, 1953 listing eight situations in which he had expressed a violent
intent. These had taken place between September 7, 1948 and May 11, 1951. In that period he felt a desire to
kill a man, kick a pregnant woman, push his first love into a stream, hurt her
with scissors, or drive nails into the head of a little girl. Previously, the
patient had suffered enuresis almost until the time of puberty.
Related
experiences had also taken place in the patient’s family. Once the father
threatened to kill his daughter in a state of rage. Both maternal and paternal
families have members who had undergone delusory religious ecstasy. Szondi
points out to the patient that the disposition toward religious illusions
presupposes a combination of epileptiform and schizoform heredities.
Thus, in
addition to the epileptiform background the familial therapy uncovers a
tendency toward inflative-paranoid schizophrenia. Schizoform content emerges in
a second group of ancestral dreams. In one dream his mother says that he, the
patient, had come into the world by “impregnation of the Holy Spirit.” Hence,
the mother is Mary, and the patient is Jesus. The mother believes in the Second
Coming of Jesus and that she must
105
prepare the way
for it. The patient fears that if Jesus should arrive, he
might not be
prepared.
The mother has
a brother who has had religious ecstasie3 and who has not had relationships
with women. He is called “the Holy One” in the family. The uncle appears in
several dreams of the patient, in both psychoanalytic and familial stages.
In dream #6 the
patient says that “I hold the will of my uncle ‘D’ in my hands, i.e., a
photocopy of it (black negative), in which it is stated explicitly in strong
words that the descendants are excluded. I look on the empty bed of uncle ‘D’
and find lying there his bright metal revolver; he has shot himself with the
revolver. I unload it.... I am actually able to keep this revolver for myself.”
In another room he discovers his mother in deep sorrow, and she says to him:
“It is significant that the inheritance of Uncle ‘D’ (her brother) remains
intact.”
With this dream
series the patient realizes that he is a carrier of his uncle’s tendencies. He
loves the uncle more than the other siblings, and he is the one who most looks
like the uncle. The patient had been celibate until the age of 37, as had his
uncle. The mother had insisted that both her son and brother remain identified
with her. She would not allow them to relate to any other women. Moreover, the
patient’s incestuous love with the 60 year old woman has repeated the same kind
of relationship between his mother and uncle. The fatal shooting, in dream #6,
means that the patient has broken this pattern and has become liberated from
the incestuous bonding. That is why the mother is sad in the dream.
The patient
also learns that he has been predisposed toward religious delusions, even
though he has repressed them. He had recently been informed that, before he was
born, his father had to be hospitalized for religious delusions for one and one
half years. As he approaches the end of analysis, the patient does manifest
schizophrenia. It comes out in the form of strange and powerful neologisms. He
talks out or dreams these neologisms in response to a rapid fire assault of
stimulus words by the therapist.
These
neologisms are produced in colloquial German and difficult for me to translate.
Some of the neologisms convey such images as a primeval forest, incest,
defloration, and Martin Luther throwing an ink well at the devil mirrored on
the wall. These images are followed by those of beating
106
a victim with a
club, sexual intercourse, carnal lust, vampire acts, and other forms of sadism.
The discharge
of these strange neologisms indicates that Szondi has allowed the patient to be
temporarily psychotic. Thereafter, he confronts the patient with his schizoform
heredity, explaining that it had broken into his consciousness. The schizoform
carriers are the patient’s father and uncle. Szondi helps the patient realize
that the familial schizophrenia threatens him through incestuous desires,
sadism, and lust murder. The neologisms are defenses against these repressed
sexual impulses. The patient also learns that these desires are infantile and
that he can renounce them. Having made these discoveries, the patient writes a
paper describing the religious ecstasies he had experienced between 1947 and
1950. All of these ecstatic states involve him inflated as a messianic figure
and receiving mandates from God.
The next step
of familial therapy is the preparation of a genealogy. Other than what has
already been stated, some of the significant geno tropic data follow. The
patient’s father descends from a family of farmers, many of whom had died by
accidents. Some hold aggressive, paroxysmal jobs, such as locomotive
engineering and farming. The father is a railway employee. Both he and his
parents suffer fits of rage.
The mother
descends from an Anabaptist family, in which several members are bakers and
confectioners. One brother of the mother is a stutterer and the other, uncle
“D” described above, is a victim of per secutory delusions. Uncle “D” had been
fired from his job. Several sectarian clergy are frequent visitors in the
mother’s home.
The genealogy
also incorporates data from the family of the patient’s first love, the 60 year
old woman. She claims occult powers and had terrorized her husband and, after
he died, her lover. Her father is an epileptic who dies in a falling accident.
A maternal aunt is hospitalized for paranoid schizophrenia and commits suicide
with poison. Similarly, an uncle, a pharmacist, poisons himself. Another uncle
is a minister and the administrator of an institution for epileptics. The
woman’s grandfather is a church organist and her paternal uncle a rabbi. Her
husband had been a Jew who converted to Christianity.
The 30 year old
girl, whom the patient had dated after his psychoanaly sis, descends from a
family of alcoholics. She has paranoid schizophrenic and depressive episodes,
for which she has received electroshock. She has
107
made one
suicide attempt, and, after the patient leaves the country to work in a foreign
branch bank, she has suicide ideation.
The familial
stage of therapy concludes with psychological testing. In this case the Szondi
Test profiles indicate three unconscious dangers: (1) paranoid schizophrenia;
(2) pathological attachment to a mother figure; and (3) masochistic feeling in
love and religion. These threats could come out by way of the Cain tendency, by
killing, or by way of the Abel, by studying religion seriously. Through the
shock of therapy the patient encounters his epileptic and schizophrenic
ancestors. As long as he represses these impulses, he will suffer a tragic
fate. Giving in to the ancestors makes him ill and powerless.
Finally, the
third and last stage of therapy deals with the ego analysis. This involves
building up the power of being. Szondi persuades the patient to transfer his power
of being to the realm of spirit. Taking clues from the ancestry, Szondi
recommends studying psychology and religion. This would be done privately;
meanwhile, the patient would remain employed at the bank. His personal study of
religion would be a useful source of a healing sublimation and freedom.
The patient
acts upon Szondi’s suggestion and comes to the following conclusion: “A man has
not only bright, but also dark sides. This goes for everyone without exception.
Everyone bears the Cain within, even though the strengths and realities may
vary. Against this Cain also stands Abel, to the Devil an angel. The Abel is
the light, the Cain the shadow”
(1963a, 186).
In dream #117
the patient sees a gravestone and cemetery, fire and forge and analyzes these:
It has become
clear to me, that I have finally buried my uncle D in this dream. The streams,
which flowed from this religiously disturbed uncle in me from the familial
unconscious, have been conquered. Also the paternal epileptiform heredity
(killer, hell, fire) and even the castration anxiety have become powerless.
Earlier I had produced neologisms, to defend myself against my psychotic uncle
and father. So I tried to hide them both.
Both are now
buried.
He goes on to
explain that he has become free from his religious obsessions, that he wants to
marry, and that he wishes to cultivate his new spiritual qualities with his
wife. In dream #142 he sees the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and says: “Now
come problems of integration,
108
problems of
humanization, and I am overjoyed. I will become a more sensitive man, who
unites thought with feelings.” Thus, the patient has drawn closer to the
pontifical ego at the level of faith.